Monday, October 24, 2011

Reflection


Reflection
            My “Personal Theory of Learning” from week one included two theories, social constructionism and behaviorism.  Social constructionism involves the use of conversation and collaboration in the learning process (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011).  Behaviorism uses reinforcement, punishment, and operant conditioning while students “learn as a response to the environment” (Lever-Duffy& McDonald, 2008, p. 15).  This course has deepened my knowledge and understanding of learning theory and the use of educational technology.  Furthermore, I have made some modifications to my theories because of this deepened understanding.   
            After reflecting upon my learning theories, I have come to the conclusion that I need to provide more collaboration and construction of artifacts.  All the theories presented in this course have all emphasized the importance of student centered learning.  Through technology, students can collaborate, not only in the school setting but also outside of the classroom.  No longer are students struggling to find time to meet together at someone’s house or a library to collaborate and construct artifacts.  Once a student has found information, it can be uploaded to a wiki or blog for others to find and reference.  Technology has also provided different ways in which students present their information.  Students can use various technology tools such as PowerPoint presentations, VoiceThreads, blogs, and wikis to create or utilize in their presentations.
            There are a few immediate adjustments I would like to make to my instructional practice regarding technology integration as a result of this course.  I would like to implement as many technology tools as possible into as many lessons as I can.  Right now I am using an LCD projector, PowerPoint presentations, and a SMARTboard to present information.  I would like the students to begin to create more PowerPoint presentations, VoiceThreads, and use the SMARTboard as learning tools.  After seeing the effect on student learning from last week’s application assignment, I can see the rich understanding in my students learning through the VoiceThreads and PowerPoint presentations.  This was the evidence I needed to see to help my students demonstrate their understanding, other than by using paper and pencil methods.  Because of this course my repertoire of instructional skills has expanded greatly.  I knew that technologies existed to support student learning, but was unaware of how to utilize them to best reach all learners.  This course has provided me with several ways in which I can enrich student learning and understanding.  VoiceThreads, concept mapping, virtual field trips, are all new tools to add to my repertoire that I did not have before.
            A long-term goal that I have is to help my students to become more familiar with PowerPoint presentations.  None of my students have ever created a PowerPoint presentation prior to being in my classroom.  I will create a project in which PowerPoint presentations can be an option for how to present information that the students have learned at least once a month.  This will help students to become more confident in their technology skills and prepare them for the future work place. 
Another long-term goal I have is to provide more use of my new SMARTboard.  This is the first year that I have had this piece of technology in my classroom.  It is also a learning experience for me.  I would like to provide opportunities for the students to manipulate the board more often.  At least twice a week, I will have students guide the class in correcting assignments, leading the class through a learning experience, or playing an interactive learning game.  These opportunities will strengthen student learning, confidence, and memory.



References
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011). Program three: Instructional theory vs.

learning theory [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and

technology. Retrieved from

http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=
laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1

Lever-Duffy, J., & McDonald, J. (2008). Teaching and learning with technology (3rd ed.

pp. 2–35). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Social Learning Theory


Social Learning Theory

After reading the chapter from our text that presented information about cooperative learning, I gained several insights and made some connections to the social learning theory through information presented by Dr. Orey.   Dr. Orey discussed several topics that pertain to the social learning theory.  One insight I gained from Dr. Orey stated that in a cooperative learning setting, each learner was responsible for everyone else’s learning (Laureate Education Inc., 2011).  The text supported that statement by stating that when students engage each other in groups, their learning is enhanced (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007, p. 139).  The text also suggested that during cooperative grouping situations, learners “make sense of, or construct meaning for, new knowledge by interacting with others” (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 139).  Dr. Orey goes on to state that when students teach each other, the understanding is deeper (Laureate Education Inc., 2011).  Another insight gained was when technology is added, Pitler el al, (2007) also suggested that “a modest increase in effect size” was shown in some studies.  Students can use technology to present their group’s findings with the rest of the class.  In addition, technology can also help students to gain understanding of global concerns via other students from around the world (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 145).  This is an example of something Dr. Orey presented in the video.  Orey stated that learners use context and culture to gain knowledge and understanding of our world (Laureate Education Inc., 2011).

Resources
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011). Program eight: Social learning theories


Pitler H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with

classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Voice Thread

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Constructionism in Practice


Constructionism in Practice
            Our resources make connections between instructional strategies and the constructionist and constructivism theory.  Our text stated, “when students generate and test hypotheses, they are engaged in complex mental processes, applying content knowledge like facts and vocabulary, and enhancing their overall understanding of the content” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007, p. 202).  Six tasks were presented that teachers can utilize to facilitate the generation and testing of hypotheses (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 203).  Each of these six tasks made a connection with the constructionist constructivism theory.
            One of the six tasks is invention.  In this task learners investigate a need and then create a solution (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 203).  This is a great example of the constructionist theory, which involves creating an artifact and sharing it with others (Laureate Education Inc., 2011).  Another of the six tasks is experimental inquiry where learners witness an event and then try to create a hypothesis as to causes of that event (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 203).  Students then create an experiment to test their guess (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 203).  This is another example of students involved in creating something and being actively involved in determining a solution.  A student being engaged in the process of learning is part of the constructionist theory (Laureate Education Inc., 2011).
            There are many theories available to teachers to promote student learning.  Educators need to utilize the components of each of the theories to best reach their learners.  Staying abreast on how technology can be integrated with these theories can better reach the diverse groups of learners that all educators encounter.
Resources
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011). Program seven: Constructionist and

constructivist learning theories [Video webcast]. Bridging learning theory,

instruction and technology. Retrieved from


Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with
classroom instruction that works.Alexandria,VA: ASCD.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Cognitive Learning Theory


Educators need to understand the ways in which students learn and process information.  This week’s instructional strategies and learning theory focused on making connections with student’s learning and how technology can aid in those connections.  Cognitive learning theory is based on how information is processed (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011).  Two instructional strategies presented in this weeks learning will assist me in teaching for understanding.
The first instructional strategy presented in this week’s reading was “Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers.”  In this chapter, a connection was made with the cognitive learning theory that will help me understand how to better teach my learners.  The main idea of this chapter was focused on “enhancing the way in which students retrieved, used, and organized information about a topic” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, &Malenoski, 2007, p.73).  According to the authors (2007), prior to a lesson, both cues and questions are used to recall prior knowledge while advanced organizers aid in learning (p.73).  By doing this, students will focus on what is most important out of a lesson.  This is important because the cognitive theory states that short-term memory can only hold onto five to nine pieces of information (Laureate Education Inc, 2011).
The second instructional strategy in this week’s text was Summarizing and Note Taking.  This chapter’s focused on helping me to teach the students about finding what was most important about new information (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 119).  As previously stated, students can only retain five to nine new pieces of information in short-term memory (Laureate Education Inc., 2011).  Notes and summaries can be enhanced by the use of technology via wikis and blogs (Pitler et al, 2007, p. 133).  By use of multiple avenues in which students obtain information is part of the cognitive theory (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011).  These are just a few examples of how the cognitive theory is related to our learning.
The two instructional strategies presented in this week’s resources made some connections with the cognitive learning theory.  Educators must apply this information with his or her class to promote student learning.  Instructors must know that this is not the only theory that will work with their learners, but another tool to utilize. 
References:
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2010). Program five. Cognitive learning theory [Webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction, and technology. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Behaviorism in Practice


This week’s learning focused on behaviorism and instructional strategies.  In the text, information was presented about reinforcement, practice, and homework.  Educators need to utilize this information to better assist students in their learning.

In regards to reinforcement, teachers use a variety of strategies to reinforce learning.  One such way is by use of spreadsheets (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007).  When students chart effort (based on a rubric) and achievement (test scores), connections are made between the two, leading to an increase in student effort, achievement, and learning (Pitler et al., 2007, p. 156).  The authors further stated that repeated exposure to the use of this kind of strategy is needed for students to fully see the impact of their efforts (2007, p. 159).  This is clearly supports the idea of repeated practice that is involved in the behaviorism theory.

Another example of reinforcement is student recognition.  In the text, a bulletin board displayed student work, which demonstrated great effort to achieve. Additionally, the authors stated that the meaning associated with these stories of effort was much stronger than those of “larger than life heroes” (2007, p. 162).  Again, evidence of positive reinforcement associated with behaviorism.

Practice and homework additionally support the connection with the behaviorism theory.  While students are practicing a skill, educators need to give immediate feedback to help students avoid errors that may interfere with learning (Pitler et al., 2007, p. 188).   This example is further evidence that feedback is incorporated as part of the behaviorism theory.  Furthermore, the authors stated that homework needs to be commented on (2007, p. 187).  Feedback needs to be given to the students, another example of how homework is connected with the behaviorism theory.

Evidence in this week’s resources clearly pointed out the connections between the principles of the behaviorist learning theory and instructional strategies presented.  Although there are many theories to implement in the classroom, each educator needs to fully evaluate their learners and the numerous theories available, to provide support for  student learning.

Resources

Pitler H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with

classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Reflection

      I have always felt confident in my technology skills as a professional.  This course has helped me to further develop my own technology skills as a professional teacher in many ways.  First, I learned how to use web 2.0 tools such as blogs, wikis, and podcasting.  Web 2.0 tools are concepts I had heard about but had never known how to use them, create them, or knew their purpose.  Now, I can take these tools into the classroom and introduce them to my students to better prepare them for the 21st-century workplace.  Employers are using many of these web 2.0 tools today.  Additionally, I can teach other staff members how to use these tools in their classroom.  The aforementioned examples are just a few ways that this course has helped me to develop my technology skills professionally.

      I have deepened my knowledge and understanding of teaching and learning process in various ways.  This course has helped me to see that students need to be more actively engaged in their learning.  This means that I need to be more of a facilitator and guide the students learning instead of lecturing the students.  In addition, students have access to a wide variety of technology at home and at school.  Students should, therefore, be using the technology to prepare them for the future jobs that have yet to be created.  With this understanding of the unknown future employment opportunities, I need to ensure that my students are prepared.  Likewise, students need to have real-world problems to solve creatively to help prepare them for those jobs.  Furthermore, students need to have the basic skills of keyboarding, searching for valid information on the Internet, and be able to determine the validity of that information.  Using this knowledge and information to guide my teaching will better prepare my students for the future.

      My thinking has changed from being teacher-centered to being learner-centered.  When I plan my lessons now, I try to think of ways that the students can be engaged more in small group discussions.  I have even looked into creating some centers where the students can explore concepts on an independent level or in small groups.  Another way that my teaching focus has changed is by trying to incorporate more technology rich experiences.  The students used to go to the computer for taking exams on the computer and for a few minutes once a week they worked on a math or reading program.  I would now like for them to work in small groups researching information about something that is important to them.  I would also like to have the students work a blog throughout the year.

      There are many ways to continue to expand my knowledge of learning, teaching, and leading with technology with the aim of increasing student achievement.  Researching new technology and how it is used in the classroom is one way I can continue to grow.  Another way is to reach out to other technology specialists in my district for ideas to use in the classroom.  Additionally, I can take coursework at my local college.  Most importantly, just by using the available technology will help to ensure that I do not lose the technology skills that I have recently gained.

      Numerous long-term goals come to mind immediately for transforming my classroom environment.  One goal I would like to reach within two years would be to take a technology survey of my students each year to see what the students know and have access to.  With this information I would like to have the students share what they know about technology with the other students in the classroom.  Another goal I would like to meet within two years is to successfully teach my students basic computer skills.  Concepts such as how to turn on and off the computer, where the keys are on the keyboard, and searching the Internet for information are examples of some of the basic computer skills I would like to teach my students.  

      Meeting these goals will take some time and planning.  I plan on teaching the students how to turn on and off the computers by assigning a student that job in the classroom.  For one week, it will be that student’s job to make sure the computers are ready for the day.  Then that person will teach the next person for the following week.  Each of the 5 computers in my classroom has a typing tutorial on them.  I will send groups of students to the computer to practice keyboarding skills each day.  Finally, I will guide the students through some lessons on locating valid information on the Internet while doing animal reports. 

      In regards to the checklist that was done at the onset of this class, many of my answers have changed.  In the “Practices to Support 21st Century Skills” section, many of my answers changed from “rarely” to “sometimes,” with a few going to the “often.”  For example, “Providing students with opportunities for sharing and presenting information in multiple ways, with a choice of medium (text, multi-media, graphics, etc.), my answer changed from “rarely” to “often.”  In the “Developing Technology skills for the school and workplace environments” section, my answers changed in “Promote the development of leadership and technology skills in my students and colleagues” from “sometimes” to “often.”

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Partnership of 21st-Century Skills


Evaluating 21st-Century Skills

 

            I am both excited and aggravated by the Partnership for 21st-Century Skills website.  I am excited that such an organization exists.  There needs to be advocacy for 21st-century learners.  The students of today need skills and technology to prepare them for the 21st-century and beyond workplace.  Technology literacy for all learners needs to be the goal for the Unites States.  Other countries are preparing their citizens with the skills they need now.  It is a shame that only fifteen states are on board with this organization and trying to do something to prepare their students for the future with appropriate skills.  Many of the current jobs are outsourced because we are not preparing our students for these jobs.  However, I love that the Partnership organization is trying to work collaboratively with educators, business, and government and community leaders to better prepare our students for the future workplace.

            I was surprised to see so many companies and organizations associated with the Partnership for 21st-Century Skills.  Many of them are big name companies that we all know: Apple, NEA, Dell, and Verizon to name a few.  I was elated to see that the Partnership is also pushing for professional development.  Teachers need to have professional development to aid in preparation of our learners.  It was also great to see that there was a readiness guide and information about how to get involved.
So far, I have not found anything that I disagree with.
            If this Partnership could get the whole nation involved, it would be interesting to see if all graduates would be a commodity that would be desired by employers inside and outside of the U.S.  Not only will our students be prepared for the future, many of them will be able to pull themselves out of poverty.  Our nation’s poverty rate could potentially decrease dramatically.  Students in every classroom will be prepared to meet a 21st-century workplace and have a sense of confidence knowing that they have the appropriate skills.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Week 2 Application

In my third grade classroom, I think I would use a blog initially for informational purposes and then later on to showcase student work.  My students have very little keyboarding skills since we lost our computer lab three years ago due to budget cuts.  I would like to start with the students first seeing the site and what it can do for our classroom and community.  Students and parents will see information about what is going on in the classroom.  Concepts we are learning for the month, what tests will be coming up, lunch menus, birthdays, etc. will be posted for all to see.  Then I would then like to build upon that by having students submit at least one assignment a trimester (hopefully more depending on their keyboarding skills).  Hopefully this will encourage the students to improve upon their keyboarding skills and practice at home.  I would also like to add onto this site links to things we are learning about or PowerPoint presentations about lessons being taught in the classroom.  Students and parents will be able to get help with things that students are having trouble with.  Additionally, I could possibly post the homework on here for students to get, in case they forget their homework.  I think a blog is a good tool because it can help make connections with the parents and what is going on in the classroom.  Parents will be aware of what is going on and be able to support their child at home when the child asks questions about an assignment.

Friday, July 1, 2011

Searching for Classroom Technology

At the end of the 2010-11 school year, my SMARTboard was finally installed in my classroom.  The program is being installed on my school's laptop this summer.  So, the search begins for programs to use with my SMARTboard.  I am so excited to begin to bring my classroom into the 21-century by utilizing technology to help meet the needs of the diverse learners in my classroom.